Responses to Poems :: War Poems Poetry Literature Essays

Responses to PoemsPoetry is known to fix powerful responses in lectors. Examineyour reactions to these poems. How do they make you feel and wherefore?Analyse the link between the various techniques used by the poets andyour own(prenominal) response. Use detailed references to the poems tosupport your comments.Reactions 1 Reader feels disturbed unsettled, because (No to a greater extentHiroshimas) d and u poet speaks about relics of the attack that remindus pack were the victims of these attacks, not just buildings or far governments or high-flown principles (The twenty-four hours After) d and u subscriber does not know who is right and who is wrong-what should theAmericans choose done rather than cause so more than than suffering? Was in that locationanother way to end the war? Could the countries withstand worked whatsoeverthingout? (Monuments of Hiroshima) u only was a wooden box too untold toask for? We should give the victims of the attacks whatever moresubstantial monuments, something that respects their courage or at least(prenominal)(prenominal) their individuality-makes reader think (Ghosts, Fire, Water) dand u the reader almost feels denounceed, affright of the ghosts, whoare reaching out their hands and blaming us, and he/she wants to runaway, or find some excuse for the bombings, but cannot reader alsowants to decline that he/she ever stopped loving others, but cannotThese poems make the reader feel unsettled. In No More Hiroshimas,the poet describes Hiroshima as a towns raftship like any other//Ramshackle,muddy, noisy. This makes the reader feel bad, and enjoy wherefore, ifHiroshima was so ordinary, it had to be destroyed. It makes the readerquestion how random the attacks that day were, and how much wasplanned. The poet also speaks of relics of the attack with greatvividness and descriptive language The bits of destroy clothing,//Thestopped watches, the torn shirts.//The twisted buttons. These relicsare all to do with state i.e., they are clothes or shoes orjewellery. The poet uses this vibrant mental mental imagery to remind us people werethe victims of these attacks, not just buildings or farawaygovernments or high-flown principles. The reader realizes how inhumanethe attack on Hiroshimawas. In The twenty-four hours After, the reader feelsuncertain because the poet has left him/her sitting on the fence, shy(p) of whom is right or wrong. Edward Lowbury describes Hiroshimaspain with such intensity one cannot dish up but feel for the people-yethe also tells the reader every moolah of its their fault.2 Reader feels sad, because (No more Hiroshimas) The bomb left anordinary, unexceptional town in pieces killed its people, destroyedits beautiful landmarks, and above all, saw that Hiroshima would, in aResponses to Poems War Poems Poetry Literature EssaysResponses to PoemsPoetry is known to deliver powerful responses in readers. Examineyour reactions to these poems. How do they make you feel and w hy?Analyse the link between the various techniques used by the poets andyour face-to-face response. Use detailed references to the poems tosupport your comments.Reactions 1 Reader feels disturbed unsettled, because (No moreHiroshimas) d and u poet speaks about relics of the attack that remindus people were the victims of these attacks, not just buildings orfar-off governments or high-flown principles (The Day After) d and ureader does not know who is right and who is wrong-what should theAmericans have done rather than cause so much suffering? Was thereanother way to end the war? Could the countries have worked somethingout? (Monuments of Hiroshima) u only was a wooden box too much toask for? We should give the victims of the attacks some moresubstantial monuments, something that respects their courage or atleast their individuality-makes reader think (Ghosts, Fire, Water) dand u the reader almost feels scared, excite of the ghosts, whoare reaching out their hands and blaming us, and he/she wants to runaway, or find some excuse for the bombings, but cannot reader alsowants to abjure that he/she ever stopped loving others, but cannotThese poems make the reader feel unsettled. In No More Hiroshimas,the poet describes Hiroshima as a town like any other//Ramshackle,muddy, noisy. This makes the reader feel bad, and interview why, ifHiroshima was so ordinary, it had to be destroyed. It makes the readerquestion how random the attacks that day were, and how much wasplanned. The poet also speaks of relics of the attack with greatvividness and descriptive language The bits of burnt clothing,//Thestopped watches, the torn shirts.//The twisted buttons. These relicsare all to do with people i.e., they are clothes or shoes orjewellery. The poet uses this vibrant imagery to remind us people werethe victims of these attacks, not just buildings or far-offgovernments or high-flown principles. The reader realizes how inhumanethe attack on Hiroshimawas. In The Day After, th e reader feelsuncertain because the poet has left him/her sitting on the fence, unsettled of whom is right or wrong. Edward Lowbury describes Hiroshimaspain with such intensity one cannot champion but feel for the people-yethe also tells the reader every scar of its their fault.2 Reader feels sad, because (No more Hiroshimas) The bomb left anordinary, unexceptional town in pieces killed its people, destroyedits beautiful landmarks, and above all, saw that Hiroshima would, in a