The Question of State Rights and the Cause of the American Civil War Essay

The Question of State Rights and the Cause of the American Civil War - shew ExampleIn fact, the issue of slavery barely served as a trigger that accompanimentually allow loose the war that was waiting to happen due to animosities between the states, particularly those in the to the south, and the federal government. These animosities argon based on the contrasting stand regarding the issues of state rights and the powers of the federal government when it comes to the administration of the states. It was during the presidency of Abraham capital of Nebraska that the issue of slavery became such a contentious and divisive issue in the country. Most of the states in the North have made into law the abolition of slavery but the South continued to withstand it as a very important aspect of the economy. However, Lincoln strongly pushed for the abolition of slavery on a nation-wide scope. This angered the South who also had supporters or lobbyists within the halls of congress. In a deb ate with a pro-slavery political figure, Lincoln said, I believe we shall not have peace upon the question until the opponents of slavery exigency the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the blood of ultimate extinction or on shall become alike lawful and in all the States, older as well as new, North as well as South.i This point only antagonized further the states, particularly in the south. This stance from the president himself only encouraged the Southern States to consider seceding from the coalescence and to establish their own sovereign country which would naturally continue to promote slavery as a means of utilizing manpower for its economic activities. This conflict also highlighted the unresolved debates that occurred during the founding period of the country. Such issues were at one time sidelined intentionally or were relegate to the background while the country was still trying to establish itself politic ally and economically, especially because it had just won independence. However, it did not take long for such antagonisms to grow into actual conflicts. every last(predicate) it took was for the federal government to insist on its the laws at the expense of the states for these to happen. A particular event that led to the sharpening contradictions evidently between the North and South, but actually between the federal government and the states, was what happened in the Nullification Crisis in 1832. At that time, a federal law was made that introduced tariffs in order to deter foreign competition with the products of the industry which were largely found in the North. However, such law put the South at outrage because of its dependence on imports. Through their own interpretation of the Constitution, key political leadership of the South insisted in nullifying the said tariff law. They pointed out that should the federal government exceed its delegated powers by, for example, e nactive a safety-related tariff, a state had the power to declare such an action unconstitutional and therefore null and keep down within its boundaries.ii This is exactly the same attitude that the Southern states had when the North and the federal government locomote for the abolition of slavery. Due to the fact that such legislation would put it at such great disadvantage many of the states in the South actively sought exemption from it. From the perspective of the federal gover